How Do Prior Outcomes Affect Risky Choice? Further Evidence on the House-Money Effect and Escalation of Commitment
نویسندگان
چکیده
In an experiment we study the influence of prior outcomes on risky choice. We document a strong framing effect. By manipulating the presentation format of the decision problem we can induce increased risk taking following a gain, i.e. the house-money effect (Thaler and Johnson 1990) or, alternatively, increased risk taking following a loss, i.e. escalation of commitment (Staw 1976). Maximization of a value function from prospect theory can explain some of our results. Escalation of commitment in our experiment does not appear to be driven by a need to justify or rationalize the initial decision.
منابع مشابه
How do prior Outcomes affect Risk Attitude?
Modelling choice in multi-period asset pricing requires assumptions about how prior outcomes affect risk attitude. We present an experimental study of the influence of prior outcomes on risky choice. We document a strong framing effect. By manipulating the presentation format of the decision problem we can induce increased risk taking following a gain, i.e. the house-money effect (Thaler and Jo...
متن کاملSecurity, Potential, Goal Achievement, and Risky Choice Behavior
This paper develops a new model for risky choice behavior—Target Utility Theory (TUT)—that shed light on several puzzles of the decision making and financial literatures. In particular, TUT can explain the experimental evidence related to goal seeking behavior (Payne et al., 1980), preference for security/potential (Levy and Levy, 2002), and the effect of prior outcomes on risky choice behavior...
متن کاملWhere Do We Draw The Line? Tolerance of Escalating Commitment To Troubled Projects
Escalation of commitment can commonly be characterized by a series of decisions to persist with a project despite minor yet repeated departures from prior expectations. Hampered by low cost visibility and vague progress metrics, software development project teams often tolerate seemingly minor slippages from project plans as inevitable consequences of embarking on large and complex ventures. In...
متن کاملEscalation of commitment with transparent future outcomes.
A frequent case of irrational decision making is the tendency to escalate commitment to a chosen course of action after unsuccessful prior investments of money, effort, or time (sunk costs). In previous research it is argued that escalation does not occur when future outcomes and alternative investments are transparent. Inconsistent with this argument, in an experiment in which undergraduates w...
متن کاملEscalation of Commiement in Software Projects: An Examination of Two Theories
Escalation of commitment is common in many software projects. It stands for the situation where managers decide to continue investing in or supporting a prior decision despite new evidence suggesting the original outcome expectation will be missed. Escalation of commitment is generally considered to be irrational. Past literature has proposed several theories to explain the behaviour. Two commo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001